If I recall the debate that we had last time we considered the routine motions, item d) was added on to address the concern that there might be situations arising that were not covered under the first three points, and which the committee agrees unanimously should be considered in camera. The intent of this motion is to err on the side of transparency, which I know is a value that everyone on this committee holds. What we don't want is the in camera provisions to be used for the consideration of testimony that might be embarrassing or that for some reason members might not want to have in a public meeting.
If what Mr. Bittle is suggesting is that we remove item d) so that unanimous consent is not a part of the motion, I think that would be fine. It does make the motion more limiting. Then for us to go in camera, an item would have to follow one of the first three criteria.
If I understand where he's coming from, I would be happy to remove item d).