I completely understand that it is an advantage to have it, because the test could well detect certain cases.
As for the reliability of these tests, data on false negatives and false positives from Quebec show possible errors in 20% to 30% of the cases. That is actually one of the reasons why the government is not using them at the moment.
Given such a high error rate, can we consider those tests to be reliable? I would like to hear Mr. Chagla's comments afterwards.