Fundamentally, it comes back to the mandate of the bank itself, and the importance of returning it to build public financing and moving away from engaging in support for privatization and P3s.
As I outlined just some of the challenges with P3s earlier, I find it interesting that often folks who speak in favour of P3s use rhetoric that seems very detached from the evidence. There have been, as I mentioned, reports from attorneys general that outlined just how wildly these projects overspend and it's well documented how much longer they take, how much more they cost, and how local councils and local governments lose democratic oversight of the projects themselves, which would be there if they were public projects. In many ways it's not a question of individual projects, but it comes back down to the mandate needing to be for public projects, publicly funded and publicly financed and operated.