I don't think it's accurate. If we genuinely want to see new infrastructure and there are all these problems with P3s in terms of a lack of democratic oversight, in terms of cost overruns, in terms of delivering less, why would we not go the route of public infrastructure where we don't see this level of serious problems.
It gets back to the claim that maybe there are some privately funded infrastructure projects that have worked. I think the reality is that if a clock is right twice a day that doesn't mean that it works.