The city has met with CN multiple times. We've had those discussions. We've talked about moving the yard north, because we think that's a feasible solution and it's probably the cheapest solution. The problem is—and the Port Robinson group knows this very well—the length of trains has increased, and because of the closing of one or two other yards, the amount of shunting done at that location has increased the need in that yard. You have to understand that there's a history here. That yard wasn't as busy as it is now. I think increasing activity in that yard, in a residential area, should never have happened.
Who should bear the cost? CN should bear the cost because they've increased activity and increased the length of the trains. Moving that yard because it doesn't fit in a residential area should be at the cost of CN. I know the city would work with CN, because we have some rights of way and own some property just north. We could work with them and come up with a feasible solution.
However, they have to be willing to make that move, and I'm going to tell you, a big argument they always bring up is that moving the yard north will affect their shunting operations on the length of trains they can put together. Do you know what, though? Putting together longer trains and totally disrespecting a neighbourhood is not a feasible answer.
Thank you.