Absolutely.
I take the point that was made, Mr. Chair. The terminology of “concern paper” needs work, and you may see changes moving forward on that.
A concern paper, if it's related to a serious safety risk, would not remain open if that safety risk hasn't been addressed. However, a concern paper, as Mr. Turnbull noted, that identified a disharmonization of the regulations that needed to be addressed as part of a CMT, or a certification management team, as a whole could remain open, and the validation of a product could continue. Those assessments are made on an ongoing basis.