Well, I wouldn't comment on the before or after of the sequencing. I would just observe that there is a high.... This comes from our conversations with provinces and premiers. If you look at Newfoundland and Labrador, just as an example, the citizens of Newfoundland and Labrador pay for all of their infrastructure and all of their security, and they overpay for those services while we have outdated transportation policies that subsidize rail.
I'm not saying that rail shouldn't be subsidized or should be subsidized. I'm just observing that if the issue is how the regions of this country can all be connected properly and affordably, that is an issue that should be looked at, naturally and logically, because your citizens in Chilliwack do not benefit from that. It is air that is needed for your community and for remote regions of British Columbia.
I think that's an issue, and we've put it in our submission and in our recommendations to say, as part of the review of fees, that there should be comparisons made with how other modes of transport are treated. It's a basic fairness question.