To start with your first question, certainly, on the disconnect you spoke about, I don't think there's a disconnect. I think we're talking about a lot of different things, and they're getting twisted together. We hear about prevention, and then we hear about response.
What I was saying about who bears the cost for prevention is that there were many millions of dollars spent—tens of millions—on the upgrades to new railcars to keep the product in. I think we heard there were 2,000 violations of the regulations, but only—what was it I heard?—eight of them led to a release. That's eight too many, but that's because of the equipment that's put in place, the tank car standards, the investments the railways have made on.... We used to have a lot of incidents because of bearings overheating. That's almost eliminated because of the boxes they have. Every single car, every bearing, is tested or signalled. That's the disconnect here. There's a lot of money spent on prevention. Don't lose sight of that.
