I think the guidance is the important part there, as well as some certainty around what the regulators' rulings would or would not be. As I cited earlier, there was a ruling that we disagreed with and that we believe is contrary to the original intent of APPR.
Therefore, the short answer is that it depends. If it benefited the Canadian traveller and gave them more certainty and didn't unfairly penalize airlines, then that's something we'd be open to. Those are the principles that guide us. Would it benefit the Canadian traveller? Would it inform them properly about why they were delayed or cancelled? Would it make the system as strong as possible so we wouldn't have to be at the transport committee talking about delays and backlogs?
If it met those objectives, it's something we'd strongly consider.