I think that's a great question for the author of the APPR. I mentioned in my remarks that there was a lot of discussion and debate around this precise issue when he wrote the regulations and when he testified at committee and introduced them to Canada's Parliament. I think it's probably worthwhile to revisit those arguments from that time.
I want to note that if it's not within our control, I don't want to leave a false impression that the guest is not cared for by our organization. They are. The question is the extent to which. That's the example I gave earlier about the gentleman in Regina. It's not an all-or-nothing issue. The guest will always be looked after by our company, consistent with the APPR. The question is whether additional entitlements and additional penalties are warranted. That's where we have differences.