Sure. I can start off on that one.
There has been some.... I don't want to say misreporting, but there was an incident at the Regina airport where we had a first officer call in sick an hour before their flight, Mr. Strahl, and that might be the incident you're referring to. It was remarked in the media and by some members of the committee that we were challenging whether or not we had any obligations. That is categorically false. In that instance, what we have is a disagreement over the way this is defined and what the category should be. The way we categorized the flight was safety, and the passenger was given a hotel voucher and food vouchers and was placed on the next direct flight the next day.
The question and the disagreement we have with the agency is whether or not that should be a controllable crew delay or a safety delay. Under their ruling, it's $1,000 to that guest, so that's a legitimate discussion and disagreement over what the requirement should be. However, just note that it wouldn't be anyone's reasonable expectation that we have a supply of first officers in Regina waiting to be called. That's not good business practice. No one would advise us to have that. Again, it's back to these issues of balances, and it's back to what the original APPR introduced were supposed to capture and not capture.