I don't think, if you're cherry-picking certain more extensive rights, it will fix the backlog or necessarily result in more compliance by the airlines. Because of the three streams we have in Canada, it's needlessly complicated. Ultimately, the idea is to get rid of those so that there's only extraordinary circumstances as an excuse to not pay the compensation that is otherwise owed. Apart from that, then you can add on additional European requirements if you feel the air passenger is not being treated in accordance with the Montreal Convention or what we want to have for flights in Canada.
It's tempting to just cherry-pick them, but as I said in my remarks, I think we're going structural here. At the very least, the burden has to shift to the airlines, because that would give the consumers a result in most cases more quickly.