Thanks, Mr. Chair. It is much appreciated.
Thanks for the notice of motion. A couple of things come to mind with respect to this. One is what Mr. Albas said, so that's clear. In terms of this particular motion, it doesn't state it in here so I'm assuming it's not: Does this extend the study or the discussions we're having around the length of the study even further than we're going? I guess that is question number one.
Number two is a question about the intersection of the federal government and the provincial government in terms of the production of documents and emails. Does that get complicated when it's another level of government and there are corresponding discussions with respect to programming or information around offences under particular acts and things of that nature? I'm not exactly sure, and that's why I'm asking the question. How easy is that to produce? Does it become more of a cascading series of more meetings on this? Before I say, “on this” and someone says safety is a priority, I want to make sure to say it's important and that security is absolutely a priority. Everybody wants safe roads, and we've all illustrated that.
I'm just wondering if we can have a discussion on that, because I genuinely want to know. This is a legitimate question, in particular for my colleague from the Bloc, about jurisdictions, discussions around that and information. I'll put that out there, and I might have more questions as we go.