I want to thank the Bloc member for that response. I'm with my colleague MP Greaves here, though. The reality is that we're at a point where I think it's absolutely essential to get the recommendations and report out now.
My concern—and I don't dispute the convictions of the Bloc motion—is as it was at the last meeting, when I said that I think we have a chance here of continuously—on a very important study, yes—moving the goalposts, and then two meetings—that's not in this motion and I appreciate that—become three meetings. What happens if we don't get production of documents in 30 days? Another delay?
I believe, and others can have a difference of opinion, and that's what makes this committee so great.... In my opinion—others can have a different opinion and I respect that—that would do a disservice in getting out the recommendations that we heard on the consistent themes in terms of things like how the logbook can be tampered with. Fatigue was another one. Also, of course, when we get to a certain point, there's listening to the victims, which is going to be important.
What we've heard consistently—and you see this in a lot of important studies like this essential study—is that when you get to a certain point, the information is important to have and the knowledge is important to have from all stakeholders in this study, but you see re-emerging things—