Pros will refer to the motion every three and a half minutes.
Again, Mr. Lauzon was saying, in relation to the study of Driver Inc. and the motion, which now includes many of the measures, now including the ports.... I'm speaking to the motion. He alleged that there was a coalition.
I'm clearing the air. People who may have been confused by that statement from Mr. Lauzon can know that I think it was just political rhetoric. What was also political rhetoric, though, was Will Greaves' doing a little report to his constituents, saying it was the Conservatives who were filibustering and stopping the meeting. He actually posted Mr. Lauzon's statement that it was a coalition between the Conservatives and the Bloc.
I think it's really important, because had Mr. Greaves been here, he may have addressed this directly. Maybe he would have admitted that he was wrong and Mr. Lauzon was wrong. He might have wanted to speak about pipelines, MOUs and things like that, as my colleague Mr. Lawrence had asked him to.
Getting back to the report that is proposed here, I think it's very interesting that the Bloc has asked for the Prime Minister of Canada's Office to be added to the list for a production order. Why is that interesting? It's because TVA Nouvelles did a story in the past three days outlining that the Prime Minister has been seen multiple times with a gentleman, and this obviously has some connection to the issue that has absorbed so much press time in Quebec.
I find it really interesting that the government has welcomed this. I will give the government a bit of credit. It is trying to open up the doors of the Prime Minister's Office in this motion. That's very interesting, and I hope it was done with the coordination of the Prime Minister's Office, because I wouldn't want Mr. Kelloway to lose his job as parliamentary secretary. Apparently, if you don't consult with the Prime Minister's Office on things like agreements with the Bloc on Bill C-9—