First there is relevance, and then there is repetition, for the reason that the member keeps referring to a motion that has been dealt with conclusively by the committee. He may not like the fact. He is constantly going back to the same material.
Mr. Chair, a filibuster, as honourable as a filibuster can be, has certain conditions. I expect you, as chair, to make sure he is being relevant to the motion that is on deck and is speaking with new material.
If the member can't find new material, perhaps he can speak to his hard-working staff—we have them on both sides—and they can provide him with new material.