Yes, and we have already voted on a port study and found it to be out of scope. Since we've already dealt with that particular piece of business, I ask you to rule that this is out of order, simply because the committee has already dealt with this business once.
This kind of vexatious behaviour, in which someone keeps raising the same amendment over and over flouts the will of the committee. I believe that if you check with the clerk—and I hope you do—you'll find that this piece of it is out of order. The rest of it, I believe, is worthy of discussion.