Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I do not know how to explain the fact that the Association des professionnels du dépannage du Québec is not mentioned in the motion. That may be a mistake on my part. It seems to me that it was part of the discussions we had previously had in committee and that it was also part…. We remember what Mr. Lauzon said. I must admit that it was difficult to listen to him for three hours at the last meeting. He alluded to it himself when he spoke.
I imagine that he never mentioned that he would be against that, especially since it was part of the discussion at the beginning. I assume that everyone will agree on adding the Association des professionnels du dépannage du Québec to the list of additional witnesses who must appear before the committee.
Having said that, I think we also have an opportunity to talk about the overall context of the topic we are discussing right now. I think it is important to talk about it because we did not really have the opportunity to do so at the last meeting, given that the speaking time was monopolized by a single person for almost three hours—