Then in terms of the nexus between the GEM program and Driver Inc., my thought here, if I'm understanding this, is that if you are a legitimate truck company, you're much more likely to have to take on additional costs of compliance than if you are a Driver Inc. model, which we've seen has been associated with the worst maintenance and the avoidance of GST and CPP payments. This would be yet another cost they could avoid that the legitimate carriers would have to incur. Is that correct?
