Yes, no problem.
To answer the first part of the question, I would say that, in our case, the role we can play is definitely to have infrastructure available when we need it. As I was saying earlier, it takes a long time to develop port infrastructure. It's expensive. We can't build infrastructure when events occur, as we saw last week. You have to plan well in advance. We have to have a certain capacity in front of us to be able to respond to events. That's what we can do, and that's what we're about to do. All Canadian port authorities have that mandate in mind, I believe. It's about being ready when the time comes. That's one of the things we can do on our side here in Canada in terms of capacity.
When we talk about climate resilience, it really depends on infrastructure. We're not all in the same position. We have to make sure that, whatever events occur, we will once again be able to have available infrastructure. It could involve raising the level of the wharf or draining our infrastructure to deal with extreme events while also ensuring respect for the environment when new events occur. It's important to be able to adapt to that. The port infrastructure was built many years ago, for the most part, so there are adaptation needs and investment needs for that, which are indeed significant.
