One hundred per cent. While the mandate of Bill C-5 is great, our project that we're looking at, which I spoke of, hits on all of the key targets within that, within the national trade diversification corridors fund. Our project would fit there perfectly. The issue comes in the way it's structured.
As I said, the cost-sharing aspect can be limiting for small ports. For example, as I said, we really would like to do this expansion plan and the rehabilitation of our existing berth. We need that, but if the cost is $100 million or up to $200 million, we just don't have the capacity to take on the borrowing for that. We don't have the revenue streams. It pretty well eliminates us, so that's the struggle. The expense of doing these is so high, but the small, independent ports really don't have the revenue stream, as I said, or the ability to borrow $50 million to see this through.