I was going to move an amendment to what Mr. Albas has moved.
At the end of point (b), I would add: “with the exception of meetings for which witnesses have already confirmed their presence”. It would be different from what Mr. Lauzon has moved. I don’t know how Mr. Lauzon wants to proceed. If my amendment is acceptable to him, he may be willing to withdraw his friendly amendment and we will retain mine.
He may want to keep the subamendment as currently moved. I think the proposed subamendment takes us very far into the future. I think this is an important issue. We’re only talking about two meetings. I have a feeling that this topic needs to de dealt with quickly. We can’t deal with it in May.