From my point of view, I think the important thing, in terms of an ombudsman, is whether he or she is effective. And normally you gauge effectiveness by the number of recommendations that are accepted and implemented.
I think it's less of an issue in terms of how the office is structured, whether it's legislated or not. As an example, we saw the report by Mr. Côté, of recent times, that was accepted across government without any argument. The minister, I think, directed the department to implement their recommendations immediately. So there's an example of an effective formulation of an ombudsman who is not legislated and reports to a minister.
Any ombudsman you would talk to in the world and I think all the ombudsmen you've had before your committee would all say in the ideal world that they would prefer to be legislated and have whatever resources they need to do the job as an ideal aspiration. From my point of view, it's less important how they're structured; what's more important is how effective they are.