The first thing I would ask is why are we asking for direction from the minister when it's this committee's work? We don't need direction from the minister to do the job we have been given by Parliament at committee, so I don't accept that part of it.
There are four points here, but I think the third is the only important one for this committee. Is the minister or the government open to suggestions, including adding enforcement measures to a posted statement of rights? Obviously the government is open. This committee has yet to finish its report, which I believe is very important for us to do.
There's always room to improve anything, so I'm not going to vote against this motion; there's no reason to vote against it. But the question I'm asking you very clearly is, why are we asking for the minister's advice when this is the committee's mandate?