In actual fact, we're dealing with it through another mechanism. I don't think it's a fundamental, transformational item for the review, although it's an extremely important issue for us. In other words, we have an ongoing relationship with the Department of National Defence. We meet quarterly with the senior management cadre, on to the chief of military personnel, and under the veterans services side of our house we meet constantly. One of the areas we're continually working on is to try to speed up the process of the paper flow from DND through to Veterans Affairs Canada for disability benefits and for other reasons. That issue is on the radar screen. It's one we're continuing to work with.
We realize that the issue—and we were informed and educated by DND along the same lines some time ago—is that their physicians are there to help their military members deal with problems. That's job one. Job two of providing input to the Veterans Affairs disability award process is one in which they were having difficulty meeting the workload demand.
We have introduced some changes to this to try to improve that system, and we're actually seeing quite significant improvements in turnaround times. We've offered resources to them to help find the people who can actually deal with those awards.
One of the things we're doing is actually accepting the military evidence as being the basis for our disability award program, so as not to create a second requirement. Subject to privacy concerns about whatever the CF member may have relative to that, we're able to use that document.
So there are improvements under way in that area. I see it as something we should be doing anyway, and not something we should be waiting for the veterans health services review to fix for us.