Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Again, I have to apologize in advance. I have to leave, right after my question, to go to another meeting.
First of all, I want to thank you, sir, for your service and to thank you, Helen, for your service, for allowing us to have your husband serve our country. It's greatly appreciated.
The concern we have, of course, is that we know, sir, that you can't do your job unless your family is taken care of when you're serving your country overseas. If you have children, if you're a parent who has a son or daughter overseas, if you serve overseas, to know that your family back home is okay enables you to do your job. And I think that goes without saying for most of them who are over there.
The concern we have, of course, is in the Auditor General's report that came out a while ago, and she indicated the concerns about the unfortunate lack, not unwillingness, of medical services within DND. They do a great job with what they have; it's just a question of their not having enough. There are not enough doctors, not enough psychologists, and not enough resources at this time to assist that. Brigadier-General Jaeger, I believe, indicated that as well.
One of the concerns the Auditor General indicated was that the government has a moral obligation to look after the families of military personnel, but not a legal one. Some people were questioning whether there should be a legal one. I'm of an open mind on this one right now. I really don't know what the ramifications of that could be or would be.
In your thought process, obviously you would like to have OTs embedded and in places to keep an eye on the families. Would that imply then some sort of over-and-above moral obligation to families, maybe a possible legal obligation to the families as well?