That's good to hear. I'm looking forward, down the road, in some sort of an audit, to see the number of appeals that you hear in relationship, now, to the number of the full membership. That is always going to be kept intact, I guess.
The other part I wanted to follow up on from Mr. Gaudet, and it always comes back, is about a number of elderly vets—I'm not talking about the new ones—because of the benefit of the doubt, mostly because they've not had health records available. When they were in active duty, health records weren't kept. They did things that were not reported. Even if they were, they weren't transferred. It just seems that when there seems to be clear evidence, from time to time, of individuals I've known, they always seem to be battling the benefit of the doubt. I wonder if you can comment beyond what you said to Mr. Gaudet on that.