I agree with you, but what we see here, in a table for 2005-2006, is that 4,870 cases were reviewed and 1,532 were appealed. That means that 1,532 out of 4,870 cases were once again appealed. Is that correct? Some 222 cases were reconsidered. Would you not say that it is a lot of bureaucracy? Is there not something in all of this that isn't quite right?
On November 22nd, 2007. See this statement in context.