We're prepared to cut back on the time, even if others didn't. I want to make that point.
I assume that you will do the same thing.
I was going to make some comment, but Mr. Stoffer was gracious enough to point out that his comments were political, so that saves me from coming back at him too hard. As a government, we have to actually implement these things. We don't stand on the sidelines and comment.
I do want to make the point, though, that the reason we are all extremely indebted to you--and also pleased that you're here--is that I think all members want to get this process under way as quickly as possible. We've been pushing it. In spite of all the discussion about what might come up, we finally agreed. Let's get on and get the review.
There are a number of other witnesses coming forward. Certainly it'll be a fulsome conversation and you've even suggested an additional one today. I expect that when it's over, though, we'll still be stuck with prioritization. You know that. Hopefully, we will get guidance before we get there. I'd hate to see the good ideas come in and get bogged down because they have to go through a huge long-term process.
That's the only reason, Pierre, as you know, that I was raising it. At the end of the day, somebody has to implement this stuff and I want to make sure that we don't lose that opportunity. That's why I raised it.
