Just very briefly, one of the issues that we did identify was there is a $500 figure that is granted to provide financial advice, which I think is probably too little too late in terms of the process.
This is coming back to the earlier issue when we were talking about transition between military life and civilian life. I don't think this can happen just at that point; it has to start inside the service career. I think Walter Semianiw is actually working on that, if I'm not mistaken, and making a lot of those progressive approaches to dealing with it. So it's starting to work on financial literacy early on so that as you transition out then it's not a new thing.
The point that Muriel makes is a very good one. This is the worst possible time for people to get a large cheque, particularly if the psychological or physical transition is really difficult for them, or that sort of thing. We have to do a little bit better there.
Again, this is one of those ones where you balance the individual's rights to certain things with the system of caring for the individual. To have a little bit more of a transition under the guidance of the chain of command is my sense, my feeling. The leadership has to continue to take an interest in these folks as they transition and to work more closely with the Department of Veterans Affairs than they have in the past. I know personally I've had a couple of opportunities to present very large cheques to individuals who have fought the system for very long periods of time. It wasn't always with a really positive feeling that you handed this cheque over to someone who was in the throes of still dealing with alcohol or drug dependencies, anger management issues, policing issues, or family violence issues. It's all those things, and you're handing them a cheque for a couple of hundred thousand dollars. It's not a good feeling from a command leadership perspective. So I think there's some work on that side.