I would be inclined to agree there would be some benefit to having some military, and some RCMP, possibly, when you're thinking of the RCMP. You also have to remember there are many female members of the RCMP. For example, if the board is listening to a case involving an RCMP member, I rather suspect that if the member listening to the case is from the RCMP, he might bring to the hearing a different set of values from those that somebody who wasn't very familiar with the RCMP might.
As I mentioned earlier, I sat in on a hearing, and frankly I was impressed. I thought it was very informal and I thought the adjudicators made a lot of effort to make sure they understood the issues. I was quite impressed by the process. That was the only time, and I don't know what the end result was.
Yes, I think there would be some value in the composition of the board being somewhat different.