That's a good point.
I referred to a report in my opening address from McInnes Cooper. It actually reviewed the adjudication process from start to finish. It found three reasons for the high favourability rate at the first review from VRAB. It had to do with the personal presence of the individual, but also with the fact that new evidence was brought about, and in some cases evidence that was already available at the adjudication but was not deemed important or relevant at the time and was not presented at the adjudication.
What we're saying here is that it might be worth—not the time, certainly, because time is of the essence in many cases—the effort to make sure that any evidence that is available at the adjudication process is actually presented there and then rather than during a later appeal process. I think that's an important aspect of it.