I think what's important to realize here is the fact that the very reason we separated the economic benefits from non-economic benefits was to make sure that this amount that is allocated for pain and suffering, which is the lump-sum award, should not be taken into consideration for future earnings or ability to generate wealth. It is strictly for pain and suffering, and this is why we took it apart from the economic benefits.
In the same example that was used here, for instance, a gentleman who suffers from hearing loss at a fairly low percentage might get 20% of the $286,000 for pain and suffering. However, the fact that he is now a client of Veterans Affairs Canada gives him access to all of the other programs that are associated with that, such as the vocational rehabilitation program. While he's doing that, receiving earnings loss, there's also possibly some access to other programs. I think that's the important thing.
We didn't want to touch the pain and suffering because it's a different discussion that needs to take place in another arena. It's no different for families losing family members, whether you're in the military or not. It's something that needs to be discussed in a different arena. That's why we went that way for that.