Thank you for the question.
That is absolutely the case.
The criteria are different and depend on whether the person is physically or psychologically injured. As for weapon handling and deployments, the same criteria do not apply to members of the Canadian Armed Forces who are physically injured. If I may say so, there is greater tolerance for physically injured people than for people who have been injured psychologically. However, when they leave the forces, they often pick up weapons and become shooting instructors, among other things. But, according to the system, weapons cannot be used once someone has been diagnosed with a psychological injury.
Basically, this legislation identifies many obstacles, and it should be adapted.
Thank you.