That's part of the adjudication process. The member will supply evidence of what they think, and we will adjudicate it. Often cases like that are more complex. We'll rely on jurisprudence. Is this something we've paid before? Where was the onset of the symptoms? There are certain rules regarding that.
As I said earlier, we have doctors. That's when we will refer the files to our medical experts to say, “This is what the individual is telling us. Does this make sense? Have we seen this before?” That's where we get that information.