At the moment it is, as I said in my statement, the musculoskeletal conditions. As you know, the department is looking at doing something presumptive for combat arms, and that's great. I applaud that. Use your task statement. But for non-combat arms, many of us served in field units and many of us served on ships.
We've got to take advantage of that CJT directive. For those of you who don't know what CJT is, it's if you don't have an injury in service, you serve more than 10 years and you end up with osteoarthritic problems post-service, you can use that CJT principle based on your physical fitness that you use or your trade. For the majority of the support trades, it's going to be based on their physical fitness, and that has to be documented. We're seeing decisions that are coming back in the last four months as unfavourable based on how they're interpreting the EEGs, and it's not consistent with what we've received in the past two years. I'm addressing that with the department now, because it's creating a lot of angst, especially in western Canada. We're doing a lot of those claims at the moment.