I am fine to support the motion.
The concern that I have—I'm not sure if it requires an amendment to the motion—is that in the course of testimony today, we heard testimony with respect to individual cases. Clearly, the department is not going to be able to respond to that testimony without some sort of a privacy waiver from the people who have given that testimony.
As I say, I think that the minister should be given an opportunity to respond to what has been heard today, but to a certain extent they will be limited without such a waiver. As long as we know that they will be subject to that limitation, then we go into this with our eyes open.
With that said, I will be supporting the motion.