That's a difficult one to answer.
I think I would say that, as of today, everything that has happened since Korea has probably been undervalued and under-recognized. I'm not sure why that has been the case. Perhaps it is because it certainly hasn't been as dramatic as the two major world wars and Korea. I think, going forward—although I'll agree with Sammy that the categorization of conflicts as it relates to the provision of benefits may be one thing, but I would be very hard pressed to say that the Middle East was more important than Cyprus or more important than service to the Geneva accords or Laos, Cambodia or Vietnam.
Commemoration is meant to honour service and sacrifice, and every deployment involves service and sacrifice. The numbers may be greater for some than for others, but it's the principle of service and sacrifice, and I would not want to be put in a position of ranking. It's the recognition of service and sacrifice wherever they have been that is key.