That's good, thank you.
Ms. Meunier, you mentioned the nearly $140 million investment. However, we're talking about temporary jobs. That troubles me personally because the problem could reoccur.
Why temporary jobs? If the people work 50% of the time, why not cut the number of employees in half and hire them on a full-time basis. It strikes me that would be more efficient.
That's the first part of my question.