House of Commons Hansard #131 of the 35th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was children.

Topics

Patent ActOral Question Period

Noon

Sudbury Ontario

Liberal

Diane Marleau LiberalMinister of Health

Mr. Speaker, my comments were certainly not interpreted correctly. What I said is this: We intend to review the drug patent legislation, that is Bill C-91, before 1997. This is what we have been saying since the very beginning.

I mentioned, for example, the problems we are experiencing with the use of medication by certain groups, including elderly people, who often use drugs without being in possession of the necessary information. In recent years, we have noticed an increase in the number of prescriptions. This costs governments a lot of money and is a real source of concern.

As for generic products, I increased the departmental staff responsible for reviewing applications for these products, because no name drugs help us keep costs under control.

Order In Council AppointmentsRoutine Proceedings

Noon

Kingston and the Islands Ontario

Liberal

Peter Milliken LiberalParliamentary Secretary to Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to table, in both official languages, a number of order in council appointments which were made by the government.

Pursuant to the provisions of Standing Order 110(1), these are deemed referred to the appropriate standing committees, a list of which is attached.

Government Response To PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

Noon

Kingston and the Islands Ontario

Liberal

Peter Milliken LiberalParliamentary Secretary to Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the government's response to 13 petitions.

Committees Of The HouseRoutine Proceedings

Noon

Kingston and the Islands Ontario

Liberal

Peter Milliken LiberalParliamentary Secretary to Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present the 51st report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs regarding its April 19, 1994 order of reference in relation to the Electoral Boundaries Readjustment Act.

This report is the first being tabled in accordance with Standing Order 68. Your Honour will recall that the committee was directed to draft and bring in a bill on this subject. Therefore the report includes a draft bill entitled an act to provide for the establishment of electoral boundaries commissions and the readjustment of electoral boundaries.

I know all hon. members will be interested in the contents of the report. The draft bill makes fascinating reading. I thought with the weekend coming up members might want to take it home for the weekend. Accordingly I am pleased to table it today.

I am also pleased to present the 52nd report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs regarding the associate membership of the Standing Committee on Government Operations.

If the House gives its consent, I intend to move concurrence in the report later this day.

Committees Of The HouseRoutine Proceedings

November 25th, 1994 / 12:05 p.m.

Liberal

David Berger Liberal Saint-Henri—Westmount, QC

Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present, in both official languages, the third report of the Standing Committee on Industry on Bill C-46, an act to establish the Department of Industry and to amend and repeal certain other acts.

The committee has examined and agreed to report the bill, with amendments. I would like to thank witnesses, members and staff for their contribution to the committee's proceedings.

Committees Of The HouseRoutine Proceedings

12:05 p.m.

Kingston and the Islands Ontario

Liberal

Peter Milliken LiberalParliamentary Secretary to Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, with leave of the House, I move, seconded by the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of National Defence, that the 52nd report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs presented to the House today be concurred in.

(Motion agreed to.)

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

12:05 p.m.

Reform

Ed Harper Reform Simcoe Centre, ON

Mr. Speaker, I have four petitions to present today. The first petition requests that the Government of Canada not amend the Human Rights Act to include the phrase sexual orientation.

The petitioners fear that such an inclusion could lead to homosexuals receiving the same benefits and societal privileges as married people.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

12:05 p.m.

Reform

Ed Harper Reform Simcoe Centre, ON

Mr. Speaker, the second petition is on the subject of the family.

The petitioners request that Parliament oppose any legislation that would directly or indirectly redefine the family, including the provision of marriage and family benefits to those who are not related by ties of blood, marriage or adoption, where marriage is defined as the legal union between a man and a woman.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

12:05 p.m.

Reform

Ed Harper Reform Simcoe Centre, ON

Mr. Speaker, the third petition is on the subject of child care.

The petitioners believe that current federal government child care policies are intrusive and discriminate against many families. The petitioners request that Parliament oppose any legislation that will increase child care expenditures or that attempts to regulate day care standards at the federal level.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

12:05 p.m.

Reform

Ed Harper Reform Simcoe Centre, ON

Mr. Speaker, the fourth petition is on behalf of the citizens of Brant riding.

Given that the majority of Canadians are opposed to the official languages policy imposed on them by a former Liberal government, the petitioners request that a referendum be held to either accept or reject this flawed policy.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

12:05 p.m.

Liberal

Rex Crawford Liberal Kent, ON

Mr. Speaker, I am proud to once again rise in the House pursuant to Standing Order 36 to present several petitions bearing many hundreds of names on behalf of constituents of Kent, Lambton, Sarnia and Essex. The petitioners wish to draw the attention of the House to the following.

The majority of Canadians are law-abiding citizens who respect the law. They respect the sanctity of human life and believe that physicians should be working to save lives, not to end them.

Therefore, the petitioners pray that Parliament ensures that the present provisions of the Criminal Code of Canada prohibiting assisted suicide be enforced vigorously and that Parliament make no changes in the law which would sanction or allow the aiding or abetting of suicide or active or passive euthanasia.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

12:05 p.m.

Reform

Daphne Jennings Reform Mission—Coquitlam, BC

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36, I present petitions on behalf of British Columbians.

They ask the House to amend the Divorce Act to include the right of grandparents to stand before the courts during divorce proceedings. Grandparents can then ask the courts for access to their grandchildren.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

12:05 p.m.

Liberal

George S. Rideout Liberal Moncton, NB

Mr. Speaker, I have two petitions to present. The first one is the same as the one presented by the hon. member for Kent dealing with assisted suicide.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

12:05 p.m.

Liberal

George S. Rideout Liberal Moncton, NB

Mr. Speaker, this is Mining Week, which allows us to publicize our efforts to keep mining in Canada.

I have a petition pursuant to Standing Order 36 that calls on Parliament to take action which will see employment grow in the mining sector, that exploration will be promoted and we can rebuild Canada's mineral reserves, sustain mining communities and keep mining in Canada.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

12:10 p.m.

Bloc

André Caron Bloc Jonquière, QC

Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present a petition signed by 500 residents of the Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, who, considering rumours that the passengers railway connection between Jonquière and Montreal will be closed, are asking for a moratorium before any decision is made and for public hearings to be held so that the people of the Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean can express their concerns and present arguments in favour of maintaining this railway connection.

Questions On The Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

12:10 p.m.

Kingston and the Islands Ontario

Liberal

Peter Milliken LiberalParliamentary Secretary to Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, the following questions will be answered today: Nos. 81 and 84.

Question No. 81-

Questions On The Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

12:10 p.m.

Reform

Ed Harper Reform Simcoe Centre, ON

With respect to each of the following projects, what was the result of the cost benefit analysis conducted by the office of the Minister responsible for Infrastructure; ( a ) the construction of a park building and Canoe Hall of Fame in Shawinigan, Quebec, ( b ) the construction of bocce courts in Toronto, Ontario, ( c ) renovations to Northlands Coliseum and Duccy Park reconstruction in Edmonton, Alberta, ( d ) renovations to the Calgary Saddledome in Calgary, Alberta, ( e ) removal of overhead wires in Shelburne, Nova Scotia, ( f ) construction of world class marina at Lewisport Harbour by Gateway Development Inc. in Newfoundland, ( g ) development of two residential development areas for the Ebb and Flow First Nation, ( h ) redeveloping duck/pond gardens in Winnipeg, Manitoba, ( i ) air conditioning a community hall in the Village of Debden, Saskatchewan and ( j ) construction of a building to accommodate circus training and production facilities for Cirque du Soleil in Montreal, Quebec?

Questions On The Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

12:10 p.m.

York Centre Ontario

Liberal

Art Eggleton LiberalPresident of the Treasury Board and Minister responsible for Infrastructure

The federal office of infrastructure does not conduct formal cost benefit analyses of infrastructure project proposals. It is responsible for setting up national framework agreements and reviewing project proposals received from federal implementing agencies and departments.

Costs and benefits are determined at the provincial and local levels. To be eligible for funding under the program, projects submitted by local partners must meet certain provisions of the national criteria established in the framework agreements between the federal government and the province or territory.

Question No. 84-

Questions On The Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

12:10 p.m.

Reform

Ted White Reform North Vancouver, BC

How many federal inmates currently receive each of the following payments: ( a ) old age security, ( b ) Canada pension plan, ( c ) income supplement, ( d ) unemployment insurance and ( e ) GST rebates and what crimes were they incarcerated for?

Questions On The Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

12:10 p.m.

Kingston and the Islands Ontario

Liberal

Peter Milliken LiberalParliamentary Secretary to Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

I am informed by the Departments of Human Resources Development and Revenue Canada as follows: (a), (b) and (c). Under Canada pension plan and old age security legislation, beneficiaries are entitled to continue receiving benefits while in prison.

However, to answer these parts would require the exchange of information on inmates between Human Resources Development Canada and Correctional Service Canada. The existing Old Age Security Act and Canada pension plan/income supplement legislation do not permit such an exchange.

On October 7, 1994, the Minister of Human Resources Development tabled a bill, C-54, which proposes to amend these two acts to allow for better information sharing between government departments. The Solicitor General has also tabled a bill, C-45, allowing for similar amendments to the Corrections and Conditional Release Act. These, if enacted, will allow for the exchange of information necessary to respond to these parts.

(d) Section 32 of the Unemployment Insurance Act specifically denies payment for the period during which a claimant is an inmate of any prison or similar institution.

There are control programs in effect to enforce this section of the act.

Human Resources Development Canada is not aware of any inmates receiving payment of UI benefits during a period of incarceration.

During this calendar year, January to August, there have been 1,688 disentitlements imposed denying benefits for the reason that the claimant is an inmate of a prison or similar institution.

The courts, however, are providing a more varied approach when imposing sentence on certain offenders. Payment may be made to persons serving a sentence who are not confined to an institution and who meet all the conditions of entitlement. Examples of this would be incarceration during weekends or evenings only, or electronic surveillance.

As to the question what crimes were they incarcerated for, this is of no relevance to the determination of entitlement to UI benefit. Accordingly, information on the reasons for incarceration are not collected.

(e) Correctional Service Canada provides to Revenue Canada the following information: name; date of birth; date of incarceration; date of release and nature of parole arrangements if any. This information is used to ensure that only those individuals who are entitled under the law to GST credit benefits receive them. Inmates who are confined to prison at the end of the taxation year, and had been so confined for at least six months in the year, are not eligible to apply for the GST credit benefits.

The latest information concerning the number of individuals who received the GST credit would be based on the 1993 taxation year. However, the number of federal inmates who received the GST credit is not data that is accumulated for purposes of administration of the Income Tax Act. This information is not readily available and would require a considerable expenditure and reallocation of resources to assemble. The reason for the incarceration is not provided to Revenue Canada as it is not a determining factor in providing GST rebates. To determine the nature of the incarceration of any GST credit recipient, income tax information would have to be communicated to Correctional Service Canada and that is precluded by the confidentiality provisions of the Income Tax Act.

Questions On The Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

12:10 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

The questions as enumerated by the parliamentary secretary have been answered.

Questions On The Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

12:10 p.m.

Liberal

Peter Milliken Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

I ask that the remaining questions be allowed to stand.

Questions On The Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

12:10 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

Shall the remaining questions stand?

Questions On The Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

12:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

The House resumed consideration of the motion that Bill C-55, an Act to establish a board having jurisdiction concerning disputes respecting surface rights in respect of land in the Yukon Territory and to amend other Acts in relation thereto, be read the third time and passed.