House of Commons Hansard #147 of the 35th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was patronage.

Topics

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

11:35 a.m.

Liberal

Marlene Cowling Liberal Dauphin—Swan River, MB

Madam Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36, I am presenting a petition today signed by 400 residents of my constituency of Dauphin-Swan River.

The petitioners believe that the proposed changes to Canada's existing gun laws are unfair to law-abiding gun owners. They believe the changes will have a detrimental effect on specialized business, will impose unrealistic restrictions on responsible, recreational firearms use and will have no effect in reducing the criminal use of firearms.

The petitioners call upon Parliament to refrain from passing any changes and amendments that further restrict the law-abiding gun owner.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

11:35 a.m.

Reform

Art Hanger Reform Calgary Northeast, AB

Madam Speaker, I have several petitions to table today.

The first two, bearing 101 signatures, deal with sexual orientation. The petitioners pray and request that Parliament not amend the Canadian Human Rights Act or the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in any way which would tend to indicate societal approval of same sex relationships or of homosexuality, including amending the Canadian Human Rights Act to include in the prohibited grounds of discrimination the undefined phrase sexual orientation.

I concur with these two petitions.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

11:35 a.m.

Reform

Art Hanger Reform Calgary Northeast, AB

Madam Speaker, I have two petitions dealing with firearms.

The petitioners, 515 in total, request that Parliament support laws which will severely punish all violent criminals who use weapons in the commission of a crime, support new Criminal Code firearms control provisions which recognize and protect the right of law-abiding citizens to own and use recreational firearms, and support legislation which will repeal and modify existing gun control laws which have not improved public safety, have proven not to be cost effective or have proven to be overly complex so as to be ineffective and unenforceable.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

11:35 a.m.

Reform

Art Hanger Reform Calgary Northeast, AB

Madam Speaker, I have two additional petitions on pro-life.

Petitioners, 126 in total, pray that Parliament act immediately to extend protection to the unborn child by amending the Criminal Code to extend the same protection enjoyed by born human beings to unborn human beings.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

11:35 a.m.

Reform

Art Hanger Reform Calgary Northeast, AB

Madam Speaker, I have a petition on immigration. The undersigned petitioners humbly pray and call upon Parliament to reduce immigration to the previous average level of one-half of 1 per cent of the population, or about 150,000 per year, with a basic intake of not less than 50 per cent of the total composed of carefully selected, skilled workers required by the Canadian economy and that our refugee acceptance rate be brought into line with the average of other asylum destination countries.

I concur with this petition.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

11:35 a.m.

Reform

Art Hanger Reform Calgary Northeast, AB

Madam Speaker, there are 750 names on a petition dealing with euthanasia.

The petitioners pray that Parliament will ensure that the present provisions of the Criminal Code of Canada prohibiting

assisted suicide be enforced vigorously and that Parliament make no changes in the law which would sanction or allow the aiding or abetting of suicide or active or passive euthanasia.

I concur with all of these petitions.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

11:40 a.m.

NDP

Svend Robinson NDP Burnaby—Kingsway, BC

Madam Speaker, I have the honour to present a number of petitions. The first petition is signed by a number of residents of Toronto, Ottawa and my own constituency of Burnaby-Kingsway. It notes that acts of discrimination against lesbian, gay and bisexual Canadians are an every day reality in all regions of Canada. It goes on to document some of the forms that discrimination takes in Canada.

The petitioners therefore call upon Parliament to act quickly to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and to adopt all necessary measures to recognize the full equality of same sex relationships in federal law.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

11:40 a.m.

NDP

Svend Robinson NDP Burnaby—Kingsway, BC

Madam Speaker, the second petition is signed by residents of a number of communities in Ontario, Manitoba and in the province of British Columbia.

It notes that the current Criminal Code denies people who are suffering from terminal or irreversible and debilitating illness the right to choose freely and voluntarily to end their lives with the assistance of a physician.

Therefore, the petitioners call upon Parliament to amend the code to ensure the right of all Canadians to die with dignity by allowing people with terminal or irreversible and debilitating illness the right to the assistance of a physician in ending their lives at a time of their choice, subject to strict safeguards to prevent abuse and to ensure that the decision is free, informed, competent and voluntary.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

11:40 a.m.

Liberal

Peter Milliken Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

Madam Speaker, I have the honour to present two petitions signed by residents of Kingston.

The first petition calls upon Parliament not to amend the human rights code or the Canadian Human Rights Act or the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in any way which would tend to indicate societal approval of same sex relationships.

The second petition calls upon Parliament to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act to protect individuals from discrimination based on sexual orientation.

I am pleased to table both these petitions, although conflicting, in the House today.

Questions On The Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

11:40 a.m.

Kingston and the Islands Ontario

Liberal

Peter Milliken LiberalParliamentary Secretary to Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Madam Speaker, the following questions will be answered today: Nos. 111 and 127.

Question No. 111-

Questions On The Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

11:40 a.m.

Liberal

Colleen Beaumier Liberal Brampton, ON

When will the Minister of Justice and the Minister of Health seek the co-operation of provincial governments to enforce the post-sentence detention of child sex offenders who are likely to re-offend upon release, through provincial mental health legislation and what is the timetable for having the necessary agreements in place?

Questions On The Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

11:40 a.m.

Cape Breton—The Sydneys Nova Scotia

Liberal

Russell MacLellan LiberalParliamentary Secretary to Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada

Federal/provincial/territorial ministers responsible for justice will be meeting with a delegation of ministers responsible for health in the latter part of January or early February, 1995. The report of a federal/provincial/territorial task force respecting dangerous offenders will be a topic of discussion on the agenda and the use of provincial mental health legislation to effect civil commitment will be an option among those discussions. The degree of consensus we can achieve at that meeting will largely determine the speed with which we can proceed.

Bill C-45 is currently before the House and contains amendments permitting the National Parole Board to detain persons with a high risk of offending against children until their warrant expiry date.

While legislative amendments and federal/provincial/territorial agreements/protocols will go some way to providing better tools to deal with offenders of this sort, it is doubtful that any failsafe mechanism can be found to eliminate all risk. Prudent attention to crime prevention behaviours will always be required by careful citizens.

Question No. 127-

Questions On The Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

11:40 a.m.

Liberal

Roger Simmons Liberal Burin—St. George's, NL

What action will the government take in reference to the claim made by the Auditor General in his 1994 report that "Health Canada cannot ensure that the food related and safety provisions of the Food and Drugs Act are applied fully and effectively to all food produced domestically or imported for sale in Canada," and what specific measures are being developed to deal with the gaps in information received from the provinces on "the nature, extent, timing and results of food safety inspections they undertake"?

Questions On The Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

11:40 a.m.

Sudbury Ontario

Liberal

Diane Marleau LiberalMinister of Health

Health Canada recently initiated a food safety audit of inspection programs of the other federal departments dealing with food namely Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. Specific programs being audited include those for imported foods, shellfish inspection and food container integrity. The first phase of the audit, which is in

process, will assess the suitability of these programs. A second phase of the audit, to be completed in the next fiscal year, will look at the application of these programs. Comprehensive standards for the inspection of domestic plants producing a variety of foods have also been developed.

With respect to provincial issues, the responsibility for the inspection of food which is produced and sold within a province is the responsibility of that province. The only food inspection activities that are conducted by the provinces for which the federal government is currently responsible are those activities conducted by the provinces on behalf of the federal government. Health Canada is presently considering how the food safety audit program could be extended to cover these areas. This is being dealt with in the context of the recent Canadian food inspection system initiative to more fully integrate the various food inspection systems within Canada at the federal and provincial level.

Questions Passed As Orders For ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

February 7th, 1995 / 11:40 a.m.

Kingston and the Islands Ontario

Liberal

Peter Milliken LiberalParliamentary Secretary to Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Madam Speaker, I would ask if you would be so kind to call Starred Question No. 95.

Questions Passed As Orders For ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

11:40 a.m.

The Speaker

Is it the pleasure of the House that Starred Question No. 95 be deemed to have been made an Order for Return?

Questions Passed As Orders For ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

11:40 a.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Question No. 95-

Questions Passed As Orders For ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

11:40 a.m.

Bloc

Francine Lalonde Bloc Mercier, QC

What have been the monthly unemployment rates from September 1993 to October 1994 in each of Canada's 295 federal constituencies?

(Return tabled.)

Questions Passed As Orders For ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

11:40 a.m.

The Acting Speaker (Mrs. Maheu)

The questions as enumerated by the parliamentary secretary have been answered.

Questions Passed As Orders For ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

11:40 a.m.

Liberal

Peter Milliken Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

Madam Speaker, I therefore table the return and would ask that the remaining questions be allowed to stand.

Questions Passed As Orders For ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

11:40 a.m.

The Acting Speaker (Mrs. Maheu)

Shall the remaining questions stand?

Questions Passed As Orders For ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

11:40 a.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Questions Passed As Orders For ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

11:40 a.m.

The Acting Speaker (Mrs. Maheu)

I wish to inform the House that pursuant to Standing Order 33(2), because of the ministerial statements, Government Orders will be extended by one hour and 20 minutes.

The House resumed from February 6 consideration of the motion that Bill C-44, an act to amend the Immigration Act and the Citizenship Act and to make a consequential amendment to the Customs Act, be read the third time and passed.

Immigration ActGovernment Orders

11:40 a.m.

Liberal

Brenda Chamberlain Liberal Guelph—Wellington, ON

Madam Speaker, it gives me great pleasure to participate in this debate on Bill C-44, an act to amend the Immigration Act and the Citizenship Act.

Many of my constituents have expressed concerns regarding immigration and I welcomed the minister this past September in Guelph where he spoke to us about this important issue.

Guelph-Wellington has welcomed immigrants in the past and it wants to welcome immigrants in the future. According to the last census our community is made up of new immigrants from Great Britain, Central and South America, India, various parts of Europe and parts of the Caribbean and Asia. Guelph-Wellington residents speak Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, German, Armenian and a host of other languages in their homes. Italians, Ukrainians, Germans, Austrians and other ethnic groups have associations where children learn about their heritage and people come together with others from their native lands to celebrate what they have in common.

Each one of these individuals no matter what their country of birth or their language has a desire to live here in Canada. Their Canadian citizenship is the tie that unifies and joins them all with us.

There is no doubt that Canada is the best country in the world. It is then obvious that people from every part of the globe would want to share our abundance and come to communities like Guelph-Wellington to begin to live new lives in freedom and with the hope of prosperity.

We have been generous as a people and a government, however my constituents have asked me to review the immigration system in order to ensure that our generosity is not abused. This bill is long overdue. It is necessary if we are going to restore integrity to a system that has been damaged by those who reject our generosity, ignore our laws, and fail not only every Canadian but everyone who wishes to immigrate to Canada.

Our immigration system has been built on the same elements that have made our country great. Determination, respect for each other and for our laws, hard work, and dedication to self and family have been the hallmarks of Canadians born here and elsewhere.

Guelph-Wellington's workforce is well respected because of its people. They have a tradition of excellence learned from their parents and grandparents who brought with them from foreign lands the desire to work hard and build products that are durable and of excellent quality. We have had the lowest unemployment in the country because of these qualities. Our business leaders have names like Samuelson, McCarthy, Briestensky, Sleeman, Youngman and Hasenfratz. By working together, old Canadians and new, natives and immigrants have built Guelph-Wellington into one of the finest communities in Canada.

This bill recognizes that abuses have occurred and places our generosity on notice. This bill attempts to address the concerns of the people of Guelph-Wellington and elsewhere all through the country who have witnessed a desire for fairness being questioned and challenged by individuals who have no respect for our laws. We are doing something about those who fail to recognize that our society does not tolerate criminals and criminal acts.

Bill C-44 is another example of a government that listens. Canadians have expressed legitimate concerns about current abuses. Every member in this House has heard them. This legislation is intended to help police forces do their jobs more effectively. I recently met with police in Guelph-Wellington who are frustrated by obstacles that hamper their important work.

We have listened and we are acting now. My constituents have demanded that serious criminals who are a danger to the public not be allowed to claim refugee status as a means of delaying their removal from Canada. This bill ensures that a refugee application is not a tactic for stalling.

My constituents have asked the government to eliminate the opportunity for one person to have several refugee claims processed at the same time. This bill answers those concerns.

My constituents have also asked that persons with summary convictions, whether obtained here or abroad, not be allowed to enter this country. This bill responds to that concern as well.

My constituents agree that refugees should be welcome to Canada under certain circumstances. They have watched the horror and famine in Somalia, the destruction caused by the war in Bosnia, and the plight of children in Romania. They want to share their abundance and protect genuine refugees, but they will no longer tolerate those who use the refugee system to hide behind criminal convictions and avoid deportation.

My community has examples of refugees who have been forced to flee from their countries of birth and have made successful lives in Canada. Sadly this is not always the case. Guelph-Wellington residents are tired of those who abuse our system. They are disappointed that their concern and care have been rejected by those who have no respect for their generosity.

I welcome the amendments that have been brought forward by the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration. These amendments clarify the definition of criminality and improve the enforcement package that was put forward by the minister.

These amendments also clarify timeframes and various technical points. All members of Parliament should be proud that the work of our committees and the work of the immigration committee is finally coming to fruition in this legislation. This is what our constituents have been asking us to do.

Bill C-44 gives the minister and senior immigration officials the tools to deal effectively with the concerns raised by my constituents and millions of other Canadians. This legislation, together with the immigration package recently announced by the minister, increases the credibility of our immigration system.

Canadians and those applying for immigration status at embassies and consulates at every corner of the world want a system that is fair, balanced and credible. Constituents who visit my office daily or write to me with immigration application concerns want fairness. They know there are the few who make it even more difficult for their children, their spouses, their parents and siblings to make application and be accepted into this country. They want fairness too. Those who abuse make it difficult for those who want to come to Canada to be reunited with their families and contribute to our society.

Bill C-44 prevents exploitation of our generosity. It speaks to fairness and attempts to end abuse. Who in this House would not want that? The bill recognizes the hard work and contribution of immigrants, while realizing that Canadians no longer accept criminal acts by bogus individuals or those who attempt to come to or remain in Canada to perpetuate their criminal lives. They will not stand for it.

Liberals have a long history of tolerance and fairness. We helped build Canada with people of every race, from every part of this world. Tough times have made us question our ability to welcome new immigrants.

It is my belief that we can encourage new Canadians to become active participants in our great society, while recognizing the legitimate concerns of our citizens, many of whom are first or second generation Canadians themselves. This legislation informs those who question our generosity that we will no longer allow abuse.

Our country can be shared, but with those who respect our laws and want to contribute to make this nation great. My

constituents have demanded no less. For them this legislation, Bill C-44, deserves every member's support.