House of Commons Hansard #187 of the 35th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was lobbyists.
Lobbyists Registration ActGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Kilger)
The next question is on Motion No. 22, in Group No. 4. An affirmative vote on Motion No. 22 obviates the need for a vote on Motion No. 23. A negative vote on Motion No. 22 necessitates a vote on Motion No. 23.
Order, please. I hear comments regarding Motion No. 21. That motion was already put and agreed to.
I have just received confirmation that, before proceeding with Group No. 3, Motion No. 21 was put and agreed to earlier today.
The next question is on Motion No. 22.
Don Boudria Liberal Glengarry—Prescott—Russell, ON
Mr. Speaker, I think you would find there is unanimous consent for those members who voted on Bill C-69 to be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House in the following manner with Liberal members voting nay.
Jim Silye Reform Calgary Centre, AB
Mr. Speaker, which motion are we voting on?
Lobbyists Registration ActGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Kilger)
We are now dealing with group four, Motion No. 22.
Jim Silye Reform Calgary Centre, AB
Reform Party members vote no, except for those members who wish to vote otherwise.
Len Taylor NDP The Battlefords—Meadow Lake, SK
Mr. Speaker, New Democrats vote yea on this motion.
(The House divided on the motion, which was negatived on the following division:)
Lobbyists Registration ActGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Kilger)
I declare Motion No. 22 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 23.
Don Boudria Liberal Glengarry—Prescott—Russell, ON
Mr. Speaker, I believe you would find unanimous consent to apply the vote taken on Bill C-69 in reverse to the motion now before the House.
If the House would also consider it, we could apply the same vote to Motions Nos. 25 and 28 at the same time. In other words, we would now be voting on Motions Nos. 23, 25 and 28 along with all the consequential amendments.
Lobbyists Registration ActGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Kilger)
Does the chief whip for the Bloc Quebecois agree?
Lobbyists Registration ActGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Kilger)
Does the Reform Party whip agree?
Jim Silye Reform Calgary Centre, AB
Agreed.
Lobbyists Registration ActGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Kilger)
Does the NDP agree?
Len Taylor NDP The Battlefords—Meadow Lake, SK
Agreed.
Lobbyists Registration ActGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Kilger)
I declare Motions Nos. 23, 25 and 28 negatived.
The next question is on Motion No. 30.
Don Boudria Liberal Glengarry—Prescott—Russell, ON
Mr. Speaker, I think you would find unanimous consent to apply the results of the vote on report stage Motion No. 3 to the motion now before the House.
Lobbyists Registration ActGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Kilger)
Does the Chief Whip for the Bloc Quebecois agree?
Lobbyists Registration ActGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Kilger)
Does the Reform Party whip agree?
Jim Silye Reform Calgary Centre, AB
Agreed.
Lobbyists Registration ActGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Kilger)
Does the NDP agree?
Len Taylor NDP The Battlefords—Meadow Lake, SK
Mr. Speaker, would you clarify which motion we are voting on?
Lobbyists Registration ActGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Kilger)
The motion we are dealing with is Motion No. 30.
Len Taylor NDP The Battlefords—Meadow Lake, SK
New Democrats would be voting no on this one, Mr. Speaker.
[Editor's Note: See list under Division No. 195.]
