Madam Speaker, it is quite clear what the government is attempting to do with this bill. It is attempting to redefine advertising as a service instead of as a good. It is trying to go through the back door with this legislation. It is very clear.
The hon. member mentioned that this bill is consistent with Canada's trade obligations. How in the world can he justify that comment given the facts mentioned by my colleague and that this legislation in its previous life had no success at the WTO? It is simply bad legislation. How can he say this is consistent with Canada's trade obligations when it goes against NAFTA, an agreement this government applauds?