Mr. Speaker, my question is for the Minister of Justice.
In jurisprudence there is an expression, notes taken at the time. In trials judges regularly ask police officers to refer to their notes made at the time to refresh their memories and these are considered admissible as evidence.
The information released by the member for Palliser regarding the solicitor general's conversation is from notes made at the time.
Can the justice minister, as chief attorney, tell the House how the solicitor general can claim some of these notes are true and some are false?