The hon. member has every right to hold whatever opinion he wants. The fact of the matter is that our tradition has been as follows.
After an election the party that has the most seats has the first choice of the seats. The second party, the second choice. The third party, the third; the fourth, the fourth; and the fifth, the fifth. I am responsible for where independent members sit.
We would hope that we would always act in the House after discussions and collaboration, but at the end of the day seats must be assigned and I have followed the traditions of the House.
There is no such thing as a bad seat in the House of Commons. We have all been elected in the same manner to sit in here as hon. members. I accept the hon. member may well be frustrated and disappointed, as other members might well be with their seating arrangements, but the seating arrangements as they are will stand.
Is the member rising on another point of order?