House of Commons Hansard #7 of the 36th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was information.
John Manley LiberalMinister of Industry
moved:
Motion No. 56
That Bill C-6, in Clause 31, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 20 with the following:
“Parliament or a prerogative of the Crown, other than an instrument issued, made or established under the Yukon Act, the Northwest Territories Act or the Nunavut Act.”
Pierre Brien Bloc Témiscamingue, QC
moved:
Motion No. 58
That Bill C-6 be amended by adding after line 29 on page 21 the following new clause:
“32.1 Where there is any inconsistency or conflict between this Part or the provisions of the other Parts of this Act that relate to this Part and other applicable laws of a province, particularly with respect to
(a) a signature, the law of contracts or other non-contractual forms not requiring a signature, formal requirements for entering into a contract or rules determining the place where the contract was entered into;
(b) proof of a document, the determination of whether it is an original or a copy, the retention of a document or the establishment of its legal significance; or
(c) proof and admissibility in evidence of any matter and the administration of those laws, the laws of the province prevail over this Part and those provisions to the extent of the inconsistency or conflict.”
Motion No. 98
That Bill C-6 be amended by deleting Clause 72.
Jim Jones Progressive Conservative Markham, ON
moved:
Motion No. 99
That Bill C-6, in Clause 72, be amended by replacing line 6 on page 40 with the following:
“Parts come into force on a day or days that are not earlier than three years after the day this Act is assented to, to be”
Division No. 6Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
Call in the members.
(The House divided on Motion No. 1, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 7Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
I declare Motion No. 1 lost.
I therefore declare Motions Nos. 2, 5, 9, 10, 27 to 33, 36 to 43, 47 to 49, 57, 59 to 97 and 100 to 157 lost.
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, I believe you would find consent to apply the results of the previous vote to Motions Nos. 7, 55, 58 and 98.
I believe you would also find consent to apply the results of that same vote, but in reverse to the following motions: Motions Nos. 8, 13, 16, 17, 20, 26, 35 and 56.
Division No. 7Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
Is there unanimous consent to proceed this way?
Division No. 7Government Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
(The House divided on Motion No. 7, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 39Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
I declare Motions Nos. 7, 55, 58 and 98 lost. I also declare Motions Nos. 8, 13, 16, 17, 20, 26, 35 and 56 carried.
The question is on Motion No. 3. If Motion No. 3 is negatived, the question on Motion No. 4 will have to be put.
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, if the House would agree, I would propose that you seek unanimous consent that members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House, with Liberal members voting nay.
Division No. 39Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
Is there unanimous consent to proceed in this fashion?
Chuck Strahl Reform Fraser Valley, BC
Mr. Speaker, Reform Party members present vote no to this motion.
Stéphane Bergeron Bloc Verchères, QC
Mr. Speaker, the members of the Bloc will vote in favour of this motion.
John Solomon NDP Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK
Mr. Speaker, members of the NDP this evening vote no to this motion.
André Harvey Progressive Conservative Chicoutimi, QC
Mr. Speaker, the members of the Conservative Party vote yes on this motion.
John Nunziata Independent York South—Weston, ON
Mr. Speaker, my constituents would want me to vote no to this motion.
(The House divided on Motion No. 3, which was negatived on the following division:)
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, I believe you would find unanimous consent to apply the results of the vote just taken to Motions Nos. 6, 12, 23, 25, 34, 44, 46, 50 and 52.
Division No. 8Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
Does the House agree to proceed in such a fashion?
Division No. 8Government Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
(The House divided on Motion No. 6, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 36Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
I declare Motions Nos. 6, 12, 23, 25, 34, 44, 46, 50 and 52 lost. The next question is on Motion No. 4.
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, I think you will find unanimous consent to have members who voted on the previous motion recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House, with Liberal members voting yea.
Division No. 36Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
Does the House agree to proceed in this fashion?