Mr. Speaker, members of the NDP present vote yes to Motion No. 45.
House of Commons Hansard #7 of the 36th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was information.
House of Commons Hansard #7 of the 36th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was information.
John Solomon NDP Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK
Mr. Speaker, members of the NDP present vote yes to Motion No. 45.
André Harvey Progressive Conservative Chicoutimi, QC
Mr. Speaker, Progressive Conservative members will be voting yes on this motion.
John Nunziata Independent York South—Weston, ON
Mr. Speaker, on behalf of the residents of York South—Weston I would support Motion No. 45. I would vote yes.
(The House divided on Motion No. 45, which was agreed to on the following division:)
Division No. 32Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
I declare Motion No. 45 agreed to.
The next question is on Motion No. 51.
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, I think you will find that there is unanimous consent to say that members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House, with Liberal members voting nay.
Division No. 32Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
Is there unanimous consent to proceed in this fashion?
Chuck Strahl Reform Fraser Valley, BC
Mr. Speaker, Reform Party members present vote yes to this motion.
Stéphane Bergeron Bloc Verchères, QC
Mr. Speaker, of course, members of the Bloc Quebecois support this excellent motion by our colleague from Témiscaminque.
John Solomon NDP Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK
Mr. Speaker, members of the NDP present this evening vote yes on Motion No. 51.
André Harvey Progressive Conservative Chicoutimi, QC
Mr. Speaker, the Progressive Conservative members vote nay.
John Nunziata Independent York South—Weston, ON
Mr. Speaker, Motion No. 51 would prevent the Senate from participating in a five year statutory review. I would support that motion.
(The House divided on Motion No. 51, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 35Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
I declare Motion No. 51 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 53. If Motion No. 53 is negatived, there will be a vote on Motion No. 54.
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, if the House would agree, I would propose that you seek unanimous consent that members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House with Liberal members voting yea.
Division No. 35Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
Is there unanimous consent to proceed in this way?
Chuck Strahl Reform Fraser Valley, BC
Mr. Speaker, Reform Party members present vote yes to this motion.
Stéphane Bergeron Bloc Verchères, QC
Mr. Speaker, members of the Bloc Quebecois are against this motion.
John Solomon NDP Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK
Mr. Speaker, members of the NDP present this evening vote yes to this motion.
André Harvey Progressive Conservative Chicoutimi, QC
Mr. Speaker, the Progressive Conservative members vote nay.
John Nunziata Independent York South—Weston, ON
Mr. Speaker, I would vote yes to Motion No. 53.
(The House divided on Motion No. 53, which was agreed to on the following division:)
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, I believe you would find consent to apply the results of the vote just taken to the motion for concurrence.
Division No. 37Government Orders
The Deputy Speaker
Is there unanimous consent to proceed in this fashion?
