Madam Speaker, I think the issue of trying to determine which material is appropriate and which material is not really is splitting hairs. What we are really debating today is this case and the details of this case. We know what material was involved in this case. The ruling on this case is what has incensed Canadians, I am glad to see, right across this country. It is the details and the material that was so offensive to so many of us that necessitated us to take some action, and I am glad to say members on all sides of the House to take some action, to eliminate or to address this material in a proactive manner.
In the House of Commons on February 2nd, 1999. See this statement in context.