Mr. Speaker, I do not see the point in asking a question of the aboriginal affairs minister. She never quotes a single chapter or verse from the agreement when she tries to justify her point.
Let me read from the Nisga'a treaty for the intergovernmental affairs minister. It states:
In the event of an inconsistency between Nisga'a law and federal or provincial law, the Nisga'a law prevails.
That is in the agreement. That affects 14 key constitutional areas. These are the sorts of demands that Quebec would make on the federal government, and properly it rejects those demands. Why would it accept those same things in a Nisga'a agreement in the heart of British Columbia?