House of Commons Hansard #46 of the 36th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was question.

Topics

Points Of Order

10:10 a.m.

The Speaker

Does the member have the unanimous consent of the House?

Points Of Order

10:10 a.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Points Of Order

10:10 a.m.

Some hon. members

No.

Points Of Order

10:10 a.m.

Bloc

Maurice Godin Bloc Châteauguay, QC

Mr. Speaker, following the introduction by the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs of a bill denying the fundamental rights of Quebecers, I ask for the unanimous consent of the House to table a document, which will enlighten the House.

It is an article published in Le Devoir on December 1. Its heading is as follows “Chrétien's Hard Line and Bouchard's Response”—

Points Of Order

10:10 a.m.

The Speaker

Does the hon. member have the unanimous consent of the House?

Points Of Order

10:10 a.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Points Of Order

10:10 a.m.

Some hon. members

No.

Points Of Order

10:15 a.m.

Bloc

Richard Marceau Bloc Charlesbourg, QC

Mr. Speaker, I have here a document which my friends across the way will certainly find interesting.

It is a quotation from the memoirs of Pierre Elliott Trudeau, the former Prime Minister of Canada and the mentor of the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs.

I ask for the unanimous consent of the House to table the document.

Points Of Order

10:15 a.m.

The Speaker

Does the hon. member have unanimous consent?

Points Of Order

10:15 a.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Points Of Order

10:15 a.m.

Some hon. members

No.

Points Of Order

10:15 a.m.

Bloc

Caroline St-Hilaire Bloc Longueuil, QC

Mr. Speaker, I have here an article published in La Presse on November 29. In order to enlighten members across the way, I ask for unanimous consent to table this article, entitled “Chrétien's outburst helps out Bouchard, says Dumont”.

Points Of Order

10:15 a.m.

The Speaker

Does the hon. member have unanimous consent?

Points Of Order

10:15 a.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Points Of Order

10:15 a.m.

Some hon. members

No.

Points Of Order

February 10th, 2000 / 10:15 a.m.

Bloc

Jean-Paul Marchand Bloc Québec East, QC

Mr. Speaker, following the tabling by the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, who never smiles, of a bill denying the fundamental rights of Quebecers, I ask for the unanimous consent of the House to table a document that will enlighten it. It is entitled “Quebec, the partner of the future in America”.

Points Of Order

10:15 a.m.

The Speaker

Does the hon. member have unanimous consent?

Points Of Order

10:15 a.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Points Of Order

10:15 a.m.

Some hon. members

No.

Points Of Order

10:15 a.m.

Bloc

Paul Mercier Bloc Terrebonne—Blainville, QC

Mr. Speaker, the last time I wanted to table a document, members opposite rejected my request without giving it proper consideration, since you asked for unanimous consent before I could even say what it was all about. I hope to have more luck this time.

Following the introduction by the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs of a bill denying Quebecers their basic rights, I ask for the unanimous consent of the House to table a document which could enlighten members in this House. This is an article published on February 1 in Le Devoir and entitled “Quebec made its nest in Davos”.

Points Of Order

10:15 a.m.

The Speaker

Is there unanimous consent?

Points Of Order

10:15 a.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Points Of Order

10:15 a.m.

Some hon. members

No.

Points Of Order

10:15 a.m.

Bloc

Serge Cardin Bloc Sherbrooke, QC

Mr. Speaker, I have here an article which will certainly enlighten members in this House. This article was published on January 6 in Le Soleil and is entitled “Bill on rules for referendum”.

So, following the introduction by the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs of a bill denying Quebecers their basic rights, I ask for the unanimous consent of the House to table this document.

Points Of Order

10:15 a.m.

The Speaker

Is there unanimous consent?